Showing posts with label BP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BP. Show all posts

Monday, June 21, 2010

Follow the paper and money trail

Potential explosive evidence uncovered by JoAnn Moretti at Blogster indicates that there may be possible criminal activity involving BP and Obama.

Maybe it's possible that the Congressional version of the Inquisition may reveal the connections between BP and the Democrat Party, at least according to JoAnn Moretti at Blogster. She has apparently uncovered a paper trail that purportedly connects BP, Haliburton, Deepwater Horizon, Citigroup, Goldman-Sachs, and the US. Government to a company called NALCO.

Looking at her evidence, we see some well known names in finance, Warren Buffet, Tony Rezko, George Soros and Barack Hussein Obama...mmm.mmmm.mmm.

According to Moretti, there is a concerted effort by these people and corporations to delay fixing the spewing oil leak at the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico. Though, why she makes such an assertion doesn't seem to be forthcoming. According to Obama, he was on top of the disaster on day one when SWAT teams were deployed to "secure" the area the very day it happened, yet, his regime later claimed that they didn't know the extent of the leak.

Although, Obama did say that he was pulling back to let BP handle the leak, because they were better equipped, may explain why the government seems to be taking a lackadaisical attitude towards fixing the problem. However, BP's stance seems to be just as suspect. According to JoAnn Moretti:
NALCO is associated with UChicago Argonne program. UChicago Argonne received $164 million dollars in stimulus funds this past year. UChicago Argonne just added two new executives to their roster. One from NALCO. The other from the Ill. Dept of Education.

If you dig a little deeper you will find NALCO is also associated with Warren Buffett, Maurice Strong, Al Gore, Soros, Apollo, Blackstone, Goldman Sachs, Hathaway Berkshire.

Warren Buffet /Hathaway Berkshire increased their holdings in NALCO just last November. (Timing is everything).

The dispersant chemical is known as Corexit. What it does is hold the oil below the water's surface. It is supposed to break up the spill into smaller pools. It is toxic and banned in Europe.

NALCO says they are using older and newer versions of Corexit in the Gulf.. (Why would you need a newer version, if the old one was fine?)

There is big money and even bigger players in this scam. While they are letting the oil blow wide open into the Gulf, the stakes and profit rise.

The Dolphins, Whales, Manatees, Sea Turtles and fish suffocate and die. The coastal regions, salt marshes, tourist attractions and the shore front properties are being destroyed, possibly permanently.The air quality is diminished. The Gulf of Mexico fishing industry is decimated.

All to create a need for their expensive and extremely profitable poison.

Moreover, there seems to be evidence that the corporate fatcats intended to maximize their financial gains by using Rahm Emmanuel's mantra, "Never let a good crisis go to waste."

Whatever the accuracy of JoAnn Moretti's assertions, if any of this turns out be fractionally true, this would be the death knell of President Obama's reign.

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Obtaining natural resources and transporting it is risky business

Let's posit three questions:

When a tractor trailer that's transporting dangerous chemicals and jackknifes on a highway, does the government shut down future transportation of dangerous chemicals?

When a passenger airliner crashes, does the government shut down all flights and airports?

When a freight train carrying deadly gas derails and spills the contents, causing a nearby town to be evacuated, does the government cease all further transportation of deadly gas and the railroads?

You get my point and you already know the answer.

Yet, with the Deepwater Horizon explosion resulting in millions of gallons of oil spewing into the Gulf of Mexico, the president claims this is the reason why we need to stop using oil and use "renewable" energy sources; in other words, in his ideological view, cap and trade needs to be made into law. Well, Rahm Emmanuel did say never let a crisis go to waste.

In his 18 minute, gibberish laden speech he asserted that oil companies are compelled to drill miles off shore in deep waters because "oil is a finite" source. Not quite. The reason why they have to drill that far off the coast, is due to environmentalist whackjobs that strong armed politicians into forcing them there.

He then made the statement, "I will meet with the chairman of BP and inform him that he is to set aside whatever resources are required." Not only is that unconstitutional, he doesn't have that kind of authority. Being a Constitutional professor, he should know this, but, seeing how he thinks it has a negative Bill of Rights, it's obvious why he wouldn't know it.

And he caps off his feigned outrage by proclaiming that measures will be taken to make sure nothing like this happens again. I realize that his sycophants thinks he's the messiah, but I doubt he can prevent something like this happening again. After all, he did say his powers weren't unlimited.

The fact is that blame can be spread everywhere, including the government. Particularly when the government turned down assistance from the Dutch on the third day of this disaster, citing the Jones Act that was created by Woodrow Wilson to protect labor unions. President Bush tossed this maritime law into the dust bin after Katrina, why Obama won't do it is most likely due to protecting his labor union support base.

The bottom line is cap the hole, clean the mess and then assign blame later.