Compare these two statements below and ask yourself who made them:"Our starting point is not the individual, and we do not subscribe to the view that one should feed the hungry, give drink to the thirsty, or clothe the naked ... Our objectives are entirely different: We must have a healthy people in order to prevail in the world."
"the most urgent problem today is how to limit and discourage the over-fertility of the mentally and physically defective. Possibly drastic and Spartan methods may be forced upon American society if it continues complacently to encourage the chance and chaotic breeding that has resulted from our stupid, cruel sentimentalism."
If you said Joseph Goebbels and Margaret Sanger, you'd be correct.
After the full extent of the macabre horrors that took place in the Nazi death camps were revealed to the world, the American Birth Control League quietly changed its name to the Planned Parenthood Federation of America. Or what we know today as Planned Parenthood and what was really impressive was how swift and silent this change took place.
Why the change? As with any progressive organization, when the populace catches on to what they're really all about, they change their name the same way a chameleon changes its color to blend in with its surroundings; they may have melded into the background, but, their purpose never changes and they think that nobody will notice. Just look at ACORN. People caught on to what they were doing and they were getting hammered, so what did they do? Changed their name, though their purpose hasn't changed.
In 1914, Sanger released her publication called the Woman Rebel where she advocated "No Gods. No Masters." In it she writes, "I hated the wretchedness and hopelessness of the poor, and never experienced that satisfaction in working among them that so many noble women have found." She also openly supported the infanticide program conducted by the Nazi Party in her "Birth Control Review", as well as openly advocating Hitler's Aryan supremacy.
Her mantra was "The elimination of 'human weeds', for the 'cessation of charity' because it prolonged the lives of the unfit, for the 'segregation' of the 'morons, misfits, and the 'maladjusted', and for the sterilization of genetically inferior races."
Ernst Rudin, Dr. Paul Popenoe and Mr. E.S. Gosney
A few years before World War II began, Margaret Sanger commissioned the Director of the German Experiment Programs to serve as an adviser by the name of Ernst Rudin. His work, along with other Nazi elitists, allowed for the passage of the "Law for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring" to be enacted on July 14, 1933 and become effective on January 1, 1934. This law forced compulsory sterilization of "undesirables."
The leading people in the German sterilization movement have stated ad nauseum, that this law was predicated on the work of Dr. Paul Popenoe and a Mr. E.S. Gosney. Stating that it would have been impossible to carry out the sterilization of 1 million people without drawing on the experience elsewhere. Popenoe was a leading scientist in the eugenics movement who wrote an article titled, "Eugenic Sterilization", in Margaret Sanger's Birth Control Review.
Dr. Popenoe stated that, "The situation in the U.S.A will grow worse instead of better if steps are not taken to control the reproduction of mentally handicapped. Eugenic sterilization represents one such step that is practicable, humanitarian, and certain in its results." How many Americans would be forced to go under this procedure? Between five million and ten million.
In his book, "Killer Angel" George Grant writes that Sanger believed that the unfit should not reproduce and opened a "clinic" in Brownsville, New York. This area was heavily populated with newly arrived immigrants from Slavs, Latins to Jews whom she turned her sights on to save the world from the unfit. In 1939, she organized the "Negro Project" because she was of the belief that they were an inferior race. She justified her crusade against blacks because, "The masses of Negroes ...particularly in the South, still breed carelessly and disastrously, with the result that the increase among Negroes, even more than among whites, is from that portion of the population least intelligent and fit..."
One of the methods she attempted is typical of any progressive movement and it still holds true today and that's through religion. She tried to recruit black religious ministers to spread her propaganda to churches in the South and later wrote, "The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the Minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."
If you think that Margaret Sanger and her organization didn't have any influence consider this: A 1927 case that the Supreme Court upheld was Buck v. Bell. This case shows just how much influence the American Birth Control League had, when the Supreme Court upheld Virginia's ruling that Carrie Buck and her daughter were "mentally defective" and was in need of forced sterilization.
At any rate, Sanger became increasingly hostile to Christianity and individual liberty, as well as anything to do with freedoms under the banner of God. It becomes evident when she wrote, "Birth control appeals to the advanced radical because it is calculated to undermine the authority of the Christian churches. I look forward to seeing humanity free someday of the tyranny of Christianity no less than Capitalism."
If none of this is sounding familiar, all you have to do is look to President Barack Obama's new spiritual "adviser", Jim Wallis. His message of "social justice" smacks of the typical progressive movement. What better way to spread that propaganda, than through religion?
Lothrop Stoddard
Theodore Lothrop Stoddard was born in Brookline, Massachusetts on June 29, 1883. He was a political scientist, eugenicist, anti-immigration advocate and a self appointed "pacifist. How anyone can be all of these things and claim to be a pacifist is beyond me, but that's progressives for you. He was recruited by Sanger as a board member of the American Birth Control League, the predecessor of today's Planned Parenthood.
In his book, "Into The Darkness" (1940) Stoddard states that the Nazi's had a two fold task:
to increase both the size and the quality of the population. Indiscriminate incentives to big families would result largely in more criminals and morons. So they coupled their encouragements to sound citizens with a drastic curb on the defective elements. That curb was the Sterilization Law.
According to Stefan Kuhl, author of The Nazi Connection (Eugenics, American Racism, And German National Socialism), Stoddard personally witnessed how the Nazis were "weeding out the worst strains in the Germanic stock in a scientific and truly humanitarian way." Moreover, Stoddard states that the Jewish "problem" was "already settled in principle and soon to be settled in fact by the physical elimination of the Jews themselves from the Third Reich."
Now you can see why Planned Parenthood is desperate in trying to erase their past. Margaret Sanger was as evil as they come and people, such as Woodrow Wilson held the same beliefs.
Continued...
What's in a name? Pro abortion and pro choice.
As I stated earlier, progressives change their name when people catch on to what they are up to or when they are trying to hide something. They think that people are ignorant enough that they'll just slip right past them and continue doing what they've always done. So, is there a difference between pro abortion and pro choice?
I have seen no evidence of it; if anything, it only seems pro choice when a woman chooses to abort her fetus. Consider a house bill (HB 1453) that failed to make it through committee in the Illinois State legislature (aka. A Woman's Right To Know). This bill would have required "doctors" (I use this term loosely) to give complete information with regard to the full nature of the procedure, facts about the unborn baby inside them, a list of possible physical and emotional side effects and the consequences of having it done. It would also have required a waiting period of 24 hours.
Another situation cropped up before the Super Bowl. Before a commercial about Tim Tebow even aired, "pro choice" advocates cried fowl because it supposedly "advocated pro life". Well, if they are "pro choice" you would think that they wouldn't have had an issue with Tim Tebow's mother choosing life. Not quite. Even though their attempts failed to have the ad pulled, it most certainly showed their true colors of not being "pro choice" at all.
Another sticky issue that "pro choice" advocates try their best to hide or not mention is, or was their patron saint Norma McCorvey. Who is she? Norma was Roe in Roe v. Wade and she recently changed her point of view and is now a pro life advocate. Why the volte face? In her book, "Won by Love" she writes:
I was sitting in O.R.'s offices when I noticed a fetal development poster. The progression was so obvious, the eyes were so sweet. It hurt my heart, just looking at them. I ran outside and finally, it dawned on me. 'Norma,' I said to myself, 'They're right.' I had worked with pregnant women for years. I had been through three pregnancies and deliveries myself. I should have known. Yet something in that poster made me lose my breath. I kept seeing the picture of that tiny, 10-week-old embryo, and I said to myself, that's a baby! It's as if blinders just fell off my eyes and I suddenly understood the truth--that's a baby!
I felt crushed under the truth of this realization. I had to face up to the awful reality. Abortion wasn't about 'products of conception.' It wasn't about 'missed periods.' It was about children being killed in their mother's wombs. All those years I was wrong. Signing that affidavit, I was wrong. Working in an abortion clinic, I was wrong. No more of this first trimester, second trimester, third trimester stuff. Abortion–at any point–was wrong. It was so clear. Painfully clear.
She disavowed lesbianism and in 1998 affirmed her entrance in the Roman Catholic Church. Could this be why "pro choice" advocates no longer hold her in high regards? Possibly.
You can't make something from nothing
Ask any "pro choice" advocate when life begins and your likely to get various answers, yet none of them will have the word conception in it. Merriam Webster defines conception as the process of becoming pregnant involving fertilization or implantation or both. If life begins when the heart beats, as "pro choice" people believe, then that begs the question as to how the fetus got to that stage in the first place.
Of course, nobody has ever accused progressives of using rational logic. When this question is posed to them, they typically drool on themselves and launch into a vitriolic tirade. So, we take the issue a step further and really send them into a hissy fit.
Ask a "pro choice" advocate if nature or humans can make something from nothing. If you get a response of "No", then proceed to the next stage that will surely send them into a hissy fit because there's no way around it.
Ask your "pro choice" friend if they know what Creatio Ex Nihilo means (no, I didn't misspell creation). Chances are in your favor that they won't know and this is where you win hands down.
Creatio Ex Nihilo is Latin for creation from nothing. If your "pro choice" pal told you that humans and nature can't create something from nothing, and the dictionary defines conception as the process of becoming pregnant involving fertilization or implantation or both, then wouldn't it be logical that life begins at conception?
In order for anything, including a human baby, to be created it must be conceived of first. It is a biological absolute and there is no way around it.
Before an artists puts brush to canvas, the artist must first conceive what he or she is going to paint.
Before a sculptor puts hammer to chisel, the sculptor must first conceive what he or she is going to sculpt.
Before a baby is born, the mother and father must...well, you know the rest.
...Previous
Sources cited:
Margaret Sanger, Sterilization, and the Swastika
Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood: Link to the Occult
The rising tide of color against white world-supremacy - Lothrop Stoddard
BUCK v. BELL, 274 U.S. 200 (1927)
Into The Darkness - Lothrop Stoddard
Killer Angel - George Grant
The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism, and German National Socialism
- Stefan KuhlWon by Love: Norma McCorvey, Jane Roe of Roe V. Wade, Speaks Out for the Unborn As She Shares Her New Conviction for Life
- Norma McCorvey, Jane Roe of Roe V. Wade
No comments:
Post a Comment