Big Sis breaks the deportation record. The silence is deafening in the White House

According to Janet Napolitano (aka. Big Sis), she has broken the record of deporting illegal aliens this year.

She claims that the Obama administration deported 393,000 illegal aliens, breaking the 2009 record of 389,000 and half of the them were criminal arrests. If these numbers are accurate, then she broke Bush's record by 81,000 in his last complete year in office. Not only did she break the deportation record, she claims an audit of 2,200 businesses resulting in 180 criminal charges.

These numbers and results are impressive. But, it begs the question as to why the White House has been silent on these record breaking results. The New York Times had buried the success story so deep, you could only find it by accident.

Could it be that the White House doesn't want to jeopardize the Hispanic vote?

Read the full story at CNS News

Why Obama returned the bust of Winston Churchill

This article from the Mail Online in the UK, seems to show why President Obama has a contemptuous relationship with our strongest ally in Europe.

Below is a brief excerpt from the article:

'I narrated the whole story to Barack one evening to help him understand our family's past. He wasn't amused at all. He expressed quite a lot of concern about why the British had to punish his grandfather "on his own soil".

'He said the whole act sounded barbaric. He wondered why the British never respected African culture. The arrest, he said, was outrageous.' Shockingly, she adds: 'Generally, my grandson has never believed the British do anything for a common good, rather than their selfish interests.'

Did British soldiers really torture President Obama's grandfather? As we will see, some elements of this highly emotive story have been twisted through the passage of time.

Read more

Obtaining natural resources and transporting it is risky business

Let's posit three questions:

When a tractor trailer that's transporting dangerous chemicals and jackknifes on a highway, does the government shut down future transportation of dangerous chemicals?

When a passenger airliner crashes, does the government shut down all flights and airports?

When a freight train carrying deadly gas derails and spills the contents, causing a nearby town to be evacuated, does the government cease all further transportation of deadly gas and the railroads?

You get my point and you already know the answer.

Yet, with the Deepwater Horizon explosion resulting in millions of gallons of oil spewing into the Gulf of Mexico, the president claims this is the reason why we need to stop using oil and use "renewable" energy sources; in other words, in his ideological view, cap and trade needs to be made into law. Well, Rahm Emmanuel did say never let a crisis go to waste.

In his 18 minute, gibberish laden speech he asserted that oil companies are compelled to drill miles off shore in deep waters because "oil is a finite" source. Not quite. The reason why they have to drill that far off the coast, is due to environmentalist whackjobs that strong armed politicians into forcing them there.

He then made the statement, "I will meet with the chairman of BP and inform him that he is to set aside whatever resources are required." Not only is that unconstitutional, he doesn't have that kind of authority. Being a Constitutional professor, he should know this, but, seeing how he thinks it has a negative Bill of Rights, it's obvious why he wouldn't know it.

And he caps off his feigned outrage by proclaiming that measures will be taken to make sure nothing like this happens again. I realize that his sycophants thinks he's the messiah, but I doubt he can prevent something like this happening again. After all, he did say his powers weren't unlimited.

The fact is that blame can be spread everywhere, including the government. Particularly when the government turned down assistance from the Dutch on the third day of this disaster, citing the Jones Act that was created by Woodrow Wilson to protect labor unions. President Bush tossed this maritime law into the dust bin after Katrina, why Obama won't do it is most likely due to protecting his labor union support base.

The bottom line is cap the hole, clean the mess and then assign blame later.

Oh, what a tangled web...Obama's Watergate?

Deep Throat: You let Haldeman slip away.

Woodward: Yes.

Deep Throat: You've done worse than let Haldeman slip away, you've got people feeling sorry for him. I didn't think that was possible. In a conspiracy like this, you build from the outer edges and go step by step. If you shoot too high and miss, everybody feels more secure. You've put the investigation back months.

Woodward: Yes, we know that. And if we're wrong, we're resigning. Were we wrong?

Fast forward to 2010

Clinton: Joe. Obama has already endorsed Specter. If you drop out of the race against Specter, we can get you a cush job in the regime.

Joe Sestak: No.

Clinton: We know that Obama isn't going to get a second term. We need you to drop out of the primary so Arlen can hold his seat and we can keep a majority in Congress.

Joe Sestak: No.

Clinton: Look, Joe. Rahm has promised me that he can get you a top level job in the regime. We need you to stay in the House of Representatives because of your military background.

Joe Sestak: No. If I'm wrong, then they won't vote me into the Senate during the election.

It's almost as if the above scenario between Bill Clinton and Joe Sestak was taken right out of All the President's Men. Of course, it's my own opinion based on current news reports, but, probably close to the truth.

And the usual round table discussions and Monday quarterbacking are already asking who knew what and when did they know it. Then comes the obligatory circling of the wagons by the state run media in defense of Obama and his administration, echoing their master that nothing improper happened.

And it's all irrelevant. A crime was committed the moment Bill Clinton asked Sestak to drop out of the race against Arlen Specter and in return, he would get a top level position in the administration. It's called bribery.

According to 18 U.S.C. § 201 : US Code - Section 201: Bribery of public officials and witnesses

(b) Whoever -
(1) directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers or promises
anything of value to any public official or person who has been
selected to be a public official, or offers or promises any
public official or any person who has been selected to be a
public official to give anything of value to any other person or
entity, with intent -
(A) to influence any official act

You can read the rest at FindLaw

Up to now it's nothing more than a "He said/He said" situation. But, it is a serious one. Here we have a government official that is making the allegation that the Obama administration made him a job offer if he dropped out of the Pennsylvania primary against Arlen Specter, whom the President had already endorsed. To say that such an allegation is a serious one is an understatement, because if true, then it's an impeachable offense.

For Obama to say that nothing improper happened is already a lie, because it is now running across the news wires that Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel had asked Bill Clinton to do his bidding. This is a crime.

So. (A) Either Sestak is lying, (B) He's covering for the White House (C) Obama, Rahm Emmanuel and Clinton are lying, or (D) All the above.

Will this be Obama's Watergate? It damn well should be. If this were to occur during the Bush administration, we would never hear the end of it.

Crooks, Democrats and the MSM OH MY!

I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments by those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations.

- James Madison

Or to put James Madison's quote more bluntly, "Those who lurk in the shadows and slowly chip away at liberty are more dangerous than those who try to do it openly."

Crooks

While trying to get universal health care through the House, Pelosi knew she wouldn't have the votes to do it. So, what was the answer to that? Backroom deals, outright bribery and slight of hand; a scene taken right out of the script of the God Father: "Bene, Don Corleone. I need a man who has powerful friends. I need a million dollars in cash. I need, Don Corleone, all of those politicians that you carry around in your pocket, like so many nickels and dimes."

Despite the majority of Americans rejecting it, the democrats got it through by hook and crook. To get the last of the holdouts, Obama went so far as to sign an executive order that would deny taxpayer funding of abortions, an order that is absurd because what Obama giveth, he can taketh away and it's not supposed to be able to overturn law anyway. In other words, Stupak was going to vote yes all along.

Democrats and the MSM

Now that the democrats have completed their quest for the Holy Grail of government handouts, they have now turned their attention to demonizing their detractors, or better known as the Tea Party movement.

During the sixties, left wing radicals were protesting, rioting and in more extreme cases blowing up police stations. They were demonized into obscurity and they learned a valuable lesson. Having reemerged with suit and ties in place of signs and pipe bombs, but with the same message and agenda, they have infiltrated the government and are transforming it from the inside.

Our president has surrounded himself with these radicals and they are transforming and remolding our country into something that will become unrecognizable if it's not stopped in November. But, in order to complete it, he must target his detractors and turn the tables on them just like the left wing radicals were demonized in the sixties. With the help of the state run, lamestream media's help, of course.

So, how are the democrats and their media cohorts demonizing the opposition? By using the race card and trying to link the Tea Party movement to just about anything that could potentially cause damage to the them. Shortly after Obamacare was passed, some democrat politicians openly complained that they were receiving death threats, as well as other vile activities directed against them. Now, why would they do that? Typically, these kind of actions are dealt with under the radar and with local police agencies, yet, they openly accused right wing loons as the culprit.

In response, Eric Cantor came out and stated that someone shot a bullet through the window of his campaign office. He also stated that the reason he did so, was to openly denounce these actions and that the democrats were using these threats for political purposes and basically telling everyone from both parties to knock it off.

During the House votes, nearly a thousand protesters were gathered at the Capitol. Immediately, the lamestream media were claiming that disparaging remarks and words were hurled at democrat politicians, yet nowhere is there any proof of this, much less evidence, but quickly blaming the Tea Party movement.

Laura Ingraham has the answer in dealing with the lamestream media.



When the lamestream media try to use this tactic, throw it right back in their face. Then there is the race hustler himself, Al Sharpton. Bill O'Reilly backed Sharpton into a corner and he couldn't get out.



The way to deal with these lies and falsehoods is to stop being afraid and take it head on. These people are counting on you to run and hide, however, you also need to denounce any acts violence publicly.

Our Constitution Was Spat Upon And We Got A Slap In The Face

"The purpose of a written constitution is to bind up the several branches of government by certain laws, which, when they transgress, their acts shall become nullities; to render unnecessary an appeal to the people, or in other words a rebellion, on every infraction of their rights, on the peril that their acquiescence shall be construed into an intention to surrender those rights."

- Thomas Jefferson

Yesterday the American people got a slap in the face as our Constitution was spat upon, and by extension the will of the people. Universal health care used to be the Holy Grail of liberal progressives and they succeeded in fulfilling their quest, albeit a shaky fulfillment; many states are gearing up to fight it if the government tries to make it a mandate. We'll see as time goes by and November rolls around.

The removal of these incumbent politicians is way pass due. However, I issue a warning to anyone running to oust their opponent during the midterms: If you campaign on repealing Obamacare, you had best not make it an empty promise. If you don't make it a campaign slogan, it would be in your best interest to do so. Right now these reprobates have a foot in the door to do anything they want and if they are not run out of office, it'll get worse.

The root of the problem is that the majority of our politicians no longer listen to us. They believe that the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence no longer applies and they give rights to its citizens. These documents, to them, is a roadblock to their agenda and have been slowly chipping away at it for decades and succeeded and they need to stopped.

If you believe that there is such a thing as a pro life democrat, well now you know better. If you believed that there were such things as "moderate" republicans or democrats, well now you know better. When Scott Brown won, the democrats knew that the writing was on the wall and they turned up the heat by making back room deals and committing felonious crimes to get their agenda pushed through.

And we were telling you this in 2008, during the campaigns. For those of you who voted for Obama, how's that hope and change working out for you now? And I'm mainly asking the independents this question.

What should happen next is a trip to the SCOTUS. This has got to be fought to the bitter end until all avenues have been exhausted and the states take up the fight. When November comes up on the calendar, then it's time to take it to the ballot box and run these people out of office and repeal it.

And you know what? Whether you like it or not, it's our fault.

Obama, Twitterer and Radical MoveOn.org Connection

Obama's Twitterer, which your tax dollars pay for, is connected to the radical progressive organization MoveOn.org. Last Friday the Wallstreet Journal revealed the identity of Obama's current Twitterer as Mia Cambronero. Sweetness & Light discovered that she is a senior fellow at the NOI (New Organizing Institute), described by Discover the Networks.

Established by MoveOn.org in November 2005
Grassroots program that trains young political organizers to work for progressive campaigns and organizations

On November 22, 2005, MoveOn.org Executive Director Eli Pariser announced that his group had created the New Organizing Institute (NOI), "a unique grassroots program that trains young, technology-enabled political organizers to work for progressive campaigns and organizations." Victory in the 2006 midterm elections was NOI's immediate priority. Said Pariser: "The Internet has made huge changes in politics ... Now, our [MoveOn's] former Organizing Director Zack Exley is working on cultivating the next generation of ‘online organizers' at the New Organizing Institute. The first step: find 50 talented up-and-coming organizers, put them through an all-expenses-paid training week, and place them on 2006 campaigns where they can really make a difference."

The importance of this is the organizations director, Zack Exley. Who is this person? Simply put, he is a radical who has ties to the domestic terrorist group, Ruckus Society. However, many may recall him as the guy who created a "phishing" site which spoofed (pretended) to be George W. Bush's.

Sources

Sweetness & Light

Newsbusters

Habledash

Wallstreet Journal

Whatever Will I Do?

After a stunning upset in Massachusetts, what's next for President Obama? A vast majority said it was unthinkable and wouldn't happen, but the people spoke and the indies pulled it off turning politics on its head. However, what caused the massive turnout to vote a Republican into the Senate seat that has been held for nearly half a century by Democrats is not a reflection of one singular thing. But, if you think that it has nothing to do with this administrations efforts to shut Americans out and shove through unpopular legislation, you are delusional. During the Virginia governor race, Obama blazed a trail to help the incumbent and failed. He flew to New Jersey to do the same and failed. Air Force One landed in Massachusetts to campaign for Martha Coakley and he failed. And let's not forget that Bill Clinton made an attempt as well. Here's a clue, Mr. President. Why don't you stop your minions from making sleazy backroom deals and stop the political bribery to shove something through Congress that you well know is not popular at all. Start listening to the American people when they tell you that they don't want something, but, if you don't, then listen closely to the person who will be delivering the Republican response to your State of the Union Address.

A Congressional Makeover in 2010

When President Bush stated, "I've abandoned free market principles to save the free market system...", it sounded the death knell for our economy. It was also one of the top ten most stupidest words ever uttered by a politician in the 21st century.

Barack Obama campaigned by talking from both sides of his mouth; to the opposition his rhetoric was one of a centrist, to his base it was a message of fundamentally transforming a great nation and his mantra to both was hope and change. Being a hairs breath away from his first full year into his first and hopefully only term, his approval ratings have slipped faster than any other president since FDR. To the experienced voter during the 2008 campaign, we asked ourselves how on the one hand someone can claim we are a great country, yet on the other hand say it needs to be fundamentally transformed.

There is no doubt in my mind how Obama became president. It was nothing more than a group of Americans that were fed up with President Bush and his administration for getting us into two wars and spending like drunken sailors on shore leave. He also appealed to younger voters or what I call the "Gimme" generation who, like a spoiled child, thought that they were going to get what they wanted.

In 2006 the democrats gained control over both houses of Congress and voted Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House; when that event occurred, I knew that this country was on the road to dark days. Since that time we have seen nothing but arrogance and contempt of Americans by ignoring us and passing legislation that is sure to drive this country into economic disaster. Though it's typical of liberals and progressives to think that they know what's best for everyone else, it's this elitist and statist attitude that will have them wondering why they are no longer sitting in their seat come this time next year.

- When asked where in the Constitution does it say that the government has the authority to force health care on Americans, Nancy Pelosi responded, "Are you serious?"

- Harry Reid recently equivocated Republicans to slave owners because they oppose health care reform. Interesting that he is ignorant of history. Republicans pushed civil rights legislation through Congress in the 1960's, while democrats filibustered it.

- Both houses of Congress are trying their best to pass bills that none of them have drafted or read.

- Obama's job summit included union bosses, yet excluded the Chamber of Commerce.

The list is endless and it's this arrogance that will be their undoing.

Recently we witnessed two gubernatorial elections where democrats were replaced with Republicans. Many liberal pundits claim that these election upsets were not a reflection of Obama and his administration. That may be, however, if these pundits think that these elections in Virginia and New Jersey are not a sign for things to come are out of touch with the real world. Why do you think that they are trying to shove a 2000 page health care reform bill through the Senate?

If you weren't paying attention to either of those elections, then you wouldn't have noticed that the young voters that Obama heavily relied on seemed to be AWOL at the ballot boxes.

If you are jobless, looking for a job, lost a home, etc and you voted for Obama, the question I have for you when you thought that He was going to deliver on his promises is:

How's that hope and change working for you?

No matter what happens, when the tides of political power shifts in November of next year, the damage that Obama and his boss, Andy Stern and Congress has done can be undone and this country can be put back on the road to its greatness.

Party Crashers

By Amy Argetsinger and Roxanne Roberts Washington Post Staff Writers Thursday, November 26, 2009 A couple of aspiring reality-TV stars from Northern Virginia appear to have crashed the White House's state dinner Tuesday night, penetrating layers of security with no invitation to mingle with the likes of Vice President Biden and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. Tareq and Michaele Salahi -- polo-playing socialites known for a bitter family feud over a Fauquier County winery and their possible roles in the forthcoming "The Real Housewives of Washington" -- were seen arriving at the White House and later posted on Facebook photos of themselves with VIPs at the elite gathering. "Honored to be at the White House for the state dinner in honor of India with President Obama and our First Lady!" one of them wrote on their joint Facebook page at 9:08 p.m. But a White House official said the couple were not invited to the dinner, not included on the official guest list and never seated at a table in the South Lawn tent. A woman describing herself as a publicist for the Salahis denied that they were interlopers. Pressed for details, Mahogany Jones sent a statement saying simply: "The Salahis were honored to be a part of such a prestigious event. . . . They both had a wonderful time." Read the rest at the Washington Post

Obama to Iran: Stop Or I'll Say Stop Again

"Talk is no substitute for action, our patience is not unlimited."

And what, pray tell, are you going to do when/if "our" patience runs out? He goes on to say, "Going forward, we expect to see swift action," this makes it the umpteenth time he has requested Iran to take "concrete steps," to follow through on their promises.

In other words, stop or I'll say stop again.

Obama's rhetoric has no teeth. The mullahs have no intention on curbing their desire to have a nuclear weapon and nothing short of direct action will get a message across that we won't allow them to posses any. Here's a novel thought. How about blockading the Persian gulf? Or, let Israel deal with them. Recalling the 1981 textbook air strike they conducted in Iraq, I'd say they are more than capable of dealing with Iran.

But, we already know the support this administration has for Israel, to quote Rahm Emmanuel, “The task of forming an international coalition to thwart Iran’s nuclear program will be made easier if progress is made in peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.“

In other words, when Israel kowtows to the Palestinians and makes concessions, we'll consider ratcheting up the heat on Iran and possibly threaten some sort of direct action, though whatever that may be is anyone's guess.

Not even one year into his first term, we are seeing that Joe Biden's "ominous" foretelling that Obama would be tested. Well, it appears that he's being tested now and all we hear is barking. So much for the "backbone of steel."

Maybe they should hire Team America.

Related articles


France warns US on deal with Iran

Rough Road Ahead to Agreement With Iran

Rio de Janeiro wins 2016 Olympic Games in landslide over Madrid

COPENHAGEN — Rio de Janeiro rode a wave of International Olympic Committee sentiment to award the Olympics to South America for the first time, winning the right to host the 2016 Summer Games on Friday in a victory over surprising finalist Madrid.

The result of the final ballot was Rio: 66, Madrid: 32.

"I honestly believe it is Brazil's time," Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva told the IOC voters. "For the others it will be just one more Games. For us it will be an unparalleled opportunity."

This is how you waste tax payer's money to fill the coffers of Mayor Daley and Valerie Jarrett. I suppose that Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh and FoxNews minions will be blamed.

Read the rest at USAToday

Is NEA Pushing POTUS Agenda?

This is hot off the web at Big Hollywood.com New audio has surfaced that appears to show the National Endowment of the Arts pushing a partisan agenda for the White House. Excerpted from Big Hollywood: The NEA and the White House did encourage a handpicked, pro-Obama arts group to address politically controversial issues under contentious national debate. That fact is irrefutable. Read the rest at Big Hollywood Read the full transcript here

What, No Beer Summit For Kenneth Gladney?

After Kenneth Gladney, a young African American man, was beaten by three SEIU members at Russ Carnahan's town hall meeting in St. Louis, his attorney is calling for the president and Russ Carnahan to condemn the actions of these union thugs.

In a letter written by Kenneth Gladney's attorney and sent to the St. Louis Tea Party Association, he describes in detail what these SEIU goons did to his client:

“Kenneth was approached by an SEIU representative as Kenneth was handing out “Don’t Tread on Me” flags to other conservatives. The SEIU representative demanded to know why a black man was handing out these flags. The SEIU member used a racial slur against Kenneth, and then punched him in the face. Kenneth fell to the ground. Another SEIU member yelled racial epithets at Kenneth as he kicked him in the head and back. Kenneth was also brutally attacked by one other male SEIU member and an unidentified woman.”

The actions by these paid activists reminds me of Kristallnacht, (are these the Nazis Pelosi was referring to?). The only exception being that there wasn't an assassination that triggered the violence towards Mr. Gladney, unless you consider free speech being murdered.

So where is the beer for this man, Mr. President? Are you calibrating your message before you open your mouth? Are you trying to distance yourself from your own past?